Scientific Reporting and Reviewer Responses

Scientific reporting and APA formatting — Scientific Reporting
APA tables, findings write-up and reviewer responses

We prepare APA-format tables and figures, write up findings, draft responses to reviewers and support you through the journal process.

A sound study can still be rejected because the manuscript around it was badly constructed. Reporting is not cosmetic: it is what allows a reviewer to judge the work as sound.

We prepare the tables and figures to APA specification, write the findings so that each result is stated with its effect size and interval rather than its p-value alone, and draft the limitations section so it works in your favour rather than against you.

Where you have received a decision letter, we help you triage the reviewer comments, decide what to concede and what to defend, and draft the response.

Where We Help

Tables and figures

APA-format output prepared to the target journal’s specification.

Findings write-up

Results stated with effect sizes and intervals, in the language reviewers expect.

Reviewer responses

Triage of the comments, and a point-by-point response drafted with you.

How the Process Works

Initial assessmentYou share your research question, your dataset and your target journal. Together we decide which analysis is appropriate.
Proposal and planScope, timeline and fee are agreed, and what you will receive is set out in writing.
AnalysisAssumption checks, model specification and estimation, with interim findings shared with you.
Delivery and handoverAPA-format tables, a written interpretation and a handover conversation. We do not request authorship for standard analysis work.